What makes ruby different

The Ruby way is inconvenient for large projects where a few not-well-babysat developers will create some hard-to-find bugs deep within the project.

Ruby you definitely need to talk about your own style guide, your own linters or else younger developers and more opinionated developers will wreak havoc. Ruby is easier for me to understand and faster for me to write. Being super-explicit with everything gets old fast Python. If you read the ruby above, it reads left-to-write as what process your code is actually performing.

Dealing with strings in ruby is slightly easier—the heredoc, regex, and interpolation are all less awkward. The idea of private instance methods, attribute access and smallest interfaces necessary in your classes makes everything a little more sane as well it answers which information and state can I access on the outside vs the inside?

Static methods in python, in their definition, just look super awkward. In Python you pass in self for an instance method and you add double-underscore in the front for a static method.

Rails is beyond Django in my view. These web development frameworks are designed to do one thing—lower the cost of development. Often people point to dataframes as a reason to use Python. The flexibility within Ruby hash and array objects can get you a lot of the way there. Both are going to be buggy because of the interpreter and flexibility but both are virtually equally slow. Use Go or C or try Crystal. Great for an article on benchmarks and algorithms but not an issue in reality.

Both ruby and python especially python 3. Dang, was hoping for a Ruby vs. Python not Rails vs. Your email address will not be published. Reply Faculty at Columbia Business School. I write about startups, technology, and philosophy. Learn to Code Django vs. Django Ruby on Rails ruby vs. Python vs. PHP Web Development what is ruby used for. Though I loved Django, but Ruby took me on Rails! Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Tons of features out of the box for web development Quick to embrace new things.

Very easy to learn A diverse community with big ties to Linux and academia. Innovates quicker but causes more things to break Very web focused. Benefits of Ruby :. Skip to content.

Change Language. Related Articles. Table of Contents. Save Article. Improve Article. Like Article. On big integers, too. On strings, it concatenates them which you'd kind of expect too. But there are operations like map or filter , they work on lists they should! I like how array or list indexing works, you can use positive integer indexes to index from the start, or negative indexes to specify a position back from the end of the structure, you can specify a range to pull out a subset The author of Ruby expressed this in terms of satisfying the user's i.

He worked very hard to satisfy this requirement. There are places where it's appropriate to specify a function inline, and Ruby lets you do it conveniently. Ruby lets you do things with a small amount of coding because its constructs fit together in powerful ways.

I dabble in Project Euler and I find that often the shortest legible and understandable solutions were done in Ruby. The very shortest are in J, but that's an APL dialect and to the uninitiated it looks like line noise. My personal experience bears this out: I taught myself Ruby and Rails and wrote a Web application with medium-complex data analysis in one week. In my experience blocks are the biggest contributing factor to making Ruby elegant. However I believe it's more than this, the elegance of the Ruby language also comes from the libraries.

Most libraries have kept to using the unique Ruby 'style' for function names, such as 'each' for iteration or the usage of '! Ruby and DSLs has been discussed a lot. Example from sinatra :. Or from this blog :. Ruby is all about productivity and programming fun, however there are several reasons why Ruby is elegant:. I may not be able to argue that it's elegant, I think that in general elegance is derived by the programmer's implementation.

However I can argue that it is concise and I think that's what a lot of people are really feeling when they say that Ruby is elegant.

Often times code that comes together quickly feels elegant. You can see the results of the programming language shootout here. You'll notice that Ruby 1. I would wager that anyone talking about a language being elegant is talking about a language that is either on the left side or close. Haskell being one of the only notable exceptions I know which takes a lot of effort to get certain things done but still feels exceedingly elegant doing it.

Just an amusing side note: this feels like php yet is Ruby from earlier today , but the first answer feels like elegant Ruby. In PHP I ended up writing stupid long code like the linked post to do little things. In part because lambdas are basically nonexistent. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group.